Search for: "Board of Public Instruction v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The examiner replied "that he would have a look at the case and at the internal instructions before giving an answer" (idem). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
He found no intent by the State legislature to define a "school's instruction in health" by standards petitioners identified as relevant - the Health Education Content Standards for California Public Schools, as adopted by the California Department of Education. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by INFORRM
Spaw began to take handwritten notes of the conversation and instructed Hill to do the same. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, September 09, 2008 Kalson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
The Director told the Chief that the Department wanted issue a call for tenders for accommodations but also instructed the Chief to get a price from Martel. [read post]