Search for: "Brown v. District of Columbia"
Results 301 - 320
of 528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled that the Guidelines were constitutional. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
A company’s outside counsel was acting as an attorney-agent when doing a background investigation and therefore did not qualify as a reporting agency under the FCRA, ruled a federal court in the District of Columbia (Mattiaccio v G, II v DHA Group, Inc). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Judge Richard Leon of the District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
This issue is at the center of a recent decision from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Buck v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, holding that Columbia Gas Transmission Company, an interstate natural gas company regulated by FERC, has the right of eminent domain granted by 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Sharpe and Brown v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, in a case of first impression, considered whether the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:14 pm
On July 1, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kellogg Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
For instance, the PPACA defines “States” as the 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:05 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); Wolf Run Mining Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:28 pm
Avanti Capital Partners, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, Highland Residential, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, and Ivan Wade Brown, an IndividualCase number: 12-cv-00788 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: August 13, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: April 24, 2014 6/19/2014 9/17/2014 2014-69 SEC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Crying foul, Ralls brought suit against CFIUS in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which last year dismissed the suit on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:19 pm
Circuit did not directly address the work-product privilege issue in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.5Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia — runs to 150 pages in five separate opinions. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 2:30 pm
In this environment, it was refreshing to see the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
Additionally, genuine issues of fact existed as to whether the department’s conduct was sufficiently extreme and outrageous, so it was for the jury to resolve this issue (Amobi v District of Columbia Department of Corrections, June 27, 2014, Brown, J). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
Following the district court’s order, and similar decisions by District of Columbia federal courts that had applied a “but for” test, the D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:50 am
District of Columbia, an opinion striking down the District’s tour guide licensing law on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
