Search for: "Brown v. Light*" Results 301 - 320 of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am by INFORRM
’ [57] The Court of Appeal noted that in R v Brown [2011] EWCA Crim 2571 Lord Judge CJ had reached a similar conclusion: ‘[I]t is difficult to see how a criminal act of distribution or circulation of a terrorist publication with the specific intent, or in the frame of mind expressly required as an essential ingredient of this offence to encourage or assist acts of terrorism, can be saved by reference to the principle of freedom of speech, unless that principle is… [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm by Josh Blackman
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133–35 (2000). [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
Brown Shoe Company, Inc., 09-cv-05051 (S.D.N.Y., Complaint Filed May 29, 2009) (handbag); Hubbell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Brown Shoe Company, Inc., 09-cv-05051 (S.D.N.Y., Complaint Filed May 29, 2009) (handbag); Hubbell v. [read post]