Search for: "Brown v. Social Security" Results 301 - 320 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:17 pm by The Blog Team
Judge Brown expressed astonishment at the rapacity of a Government that instituted collection procedures against a woman on the verge of losing her home, while jeopardizing any future tax refunds and her Social Security benefits, even though it hadn’t sought to criminally prosecute Blackhawk. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:02 pm by Joseph Margulies
They supported the Klan after Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Mueller 15-574Issue: Whether the Social Security Act’s anti-assignment provision bars a state court from considering in any manner future Social Security payments in dividing marital property upon divorce. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The government response was the enactment of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, which created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and made financial reporting obligatory for public corporations. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
The Brown decision took place outside the context of a threat to national security. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
To prevail under this standard, a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) must accept the testimony of a medical provider that the Claimant is not able to engage in at least sedentary employment, defined by the Social Security Administration as follows:   lifting no more than 10 pounds at a time and occasionally lifting or carrying articles like docket files, ledgers, and small tools. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: If you’re terminally ill, you still must wait for Social Security benefits, September 10, 2015, Cleveland.com, by Stephen Koff More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
Even so, we need not lose sleep about same-sex marriage equality leading to the Social Security Administration having to recognize all 78 of Warren Jeffs’ [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:41 am by Alfred Brophy
   In his book titled Segregation: The Inner Conflict in the South, Warren interviews black and white people around the South in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:50 am by Alfred Brophy
And it's not just that the Court and federal government are in favor of integration the New Deal and social security come under attack. [read post]