Search for: "Bruce v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions may limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines, and Manrique v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:29 am by Lyle Denniston
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, whether Indian tribal courts have authority to try cases against non-Indian businesses and individuals involved in commercial dealings with the tribe; and, in Bruce v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
Applying the multi-part inquiry test for admiralty tort jurisdiction stated by the Supreme Court in Sisson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 66.8 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:04 am by Alison Rowe
 The conference had a record number of attendees--180 practitioners from all over the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 It is worth noting that Bruce Ackerman's important rendering of the the New Deal as a "constitutional moment" amending the Constitution outside Article V in effect requires ignoring, or at least diminishing the relevance, of McCulloch. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 6:51 am
Michael Vang, Brown & Hiser, LLC, Laramie, Wyoming.Representing State: Bruce A. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm by Andrew Raff
" The complaint: Scorpio Music v Willis [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
Bush's utter unfitness to be President of the United States) by dooming a widely-accepted reform? [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Did the Constitution create a national government by “the people of the United States,” or a confederative “compact” of the states (Passim, but especially chapters 1 and 5)? [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 12:19 pm
According to the Plaintiff, it is a violation of the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution:[T]he defendants have irrationally and intentionally treated the plaintiff differently from others identically situated to the plaintiff, in violation of the plaintiff’s right to equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as enforced through Sections 1983 and 1988 of Title 42 of… [read post]