Search for: "Bull v. Bull"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2011, 8:36 pm
Astrazeneca AB et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:40 pm
Cellectis S.A. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:52 pm
Salk Institute for Biological Studies v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:45 pm
Shire LLC et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:52 pm
Shire Development Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
§ 1125(a)• Count III: Contributory Trademark Infringement• Count IV: Common Law Unfair Competition• Count V: Deception - Indiana Code § 35-43-5-3(a)(6)• Count VI: Conversion - Indiana Code § 35-43-4-3 • Count VII: Indiana Crime Victim's Relief Act - Indiana Code § 35-24-3-1 Among other remedies, Kimball seeks equitable relief, actual and treble damages, costs and attorneys' fees. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:27 pm
A copyright lawyer for PMA filed a complaint alleging the following: • Count I - Breach of Contract• Count II - Breach of Duty of Loyalty• Count III - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets• Count IV - Theft/Conversion• Count V - Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relationship and Advantage• Count VI - Lanham Act Violations• Count VII - Unfair Competition PMA asks for preliminary and… [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:33 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:28 am
That contract led to the enormously successful 1980 movie Raging Bull. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
• • • How Pandora Can Sue ASCAP was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesThe sound recording copyright includes all these rights except the right to publicly perform; instead, a sound recording copyright holder only has a narrower right to publicly perform “by means of a digital audio transmission. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
In the complaint, filed by an Indiana trademark lawyer, in conjunction with trademark attorneys from Florida and Georgia, the following counts are asserted: • Count I: Unfair Competition• Count II: Tortious Interference with Business Relationships and Prospective Advantage• Count III: Civil Conspiracy• Count IV: Unjust Enrichment• Count V: Conspiracy to Induce Breach of Contract• Count VI: Common Law… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:24 pm
In a case called Tracey v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:32 pm
In particular, the panels will focus on the following cases and topics: Panel I -- USPTO Practice (9:30 to 10:30 am) • Hyatt v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 7:27 am
v=ctiKD8jtvV8 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:30 pm
The Sixth Circuit on Friday, in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:36 am
In this federal lawsuit, filed by an Indiana trademark attorney, the following claims are made: • Count I: Federal Trademark Infringement• Count II: False Designation of Origin, False Advertising and Unfair Competition under the Lanham Act Section 43(A)• Count III: Unfair Competition - Trade Name Infringement• Count IV: Unfair Competition - Passing Off • Count V: Unjust Enrichment GAB seeks equitable relief, damages,… [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 12:47 pm
§1125(a)• Count II: Common Law Trademark Infringement• Count III: Unfair Competition• Count IV: Cybersquatting - 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:46 pm
• "If your Statement of Facts will be long -- more than five pages or so -- dividing it into sections will make it more readable.Friday's DJ also had Appeals judge fighting sexual misconduct charges sues his own court, about Johnson v. [read post]
