Search for: "Bush v. Jackson" Results 301 - 320 of 340
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
Federal pre-emption cases, like those last week, often bucked that trend, however.In Riegel v Medtronic, issued that day, medical manufacturers, backed by the Bush administration, asked the court to find that medical devices approved by the Food & Drug Administration should be immune from state law tort actions. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) (repeating this holding in the context of the FDCA), and especially Buckman Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 1:22 am
In reporting on yesterday's oral argument in Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
He's posted a PDF of Jones v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
(This was a point emphasized by Jackson in his bank veto message in 1832.) [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"David Souter was shattered" (page 177), so Bush v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:25 pm
Because, after all, at the end of the day it is not about Iran, it is to say that Bush is the enemy. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
De LaRosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria for gang activity as defined inthe CDCR rules and regulations, as well as the standard set forth in the1994 case Castillo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
Even in the Florida 2000 election case of Bush v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 12:20 am
This is really the converse of the point made by Justice Jackson in his Korematsu dissent. [read post]