Search for: "Bush v. U.s.*" Results 301 - 320 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
Bush’s use of military commissions to try suspected members of al-Qaeda in Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Bush’s use of military commissions to try suspected members of al-Qaeda in Hamdan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm by LindaMBeale
  The case is Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (2d Cir. 2010), in which Nigerian plaintiffs seek to hold Royal Dutch/Shell liable for violating the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by The Book Review Editor
His narrative runs through the attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and the U.S.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Danielle Citron
Tatum case in 1973, a year after he had testified before Congress in defense of the surveillance practices at issue, as an Assistant Attorney General in the Nixon Administration, and continued through Rehnquist’s decision sit in the 2000 Microsoft case, potential conflicts among several justices in Bush v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
A child who has posed for a camera must go through life knowing that the recording is circulating within the mass distribution system for child pornography.13 The Court reaffirmed this truism in Ashcroft v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
This form of strict liability is derived from Florida's Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine, adopted in Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:06 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Howell handed the Secret Service and the Obama Administration a setback this week, ruling that White House visitor logs are agency records subject to being produced under the Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. sec. 552] unless shielded by one of the Act's exemptions.The issue of public access to visitors lists has  plagued both the Bush and Obama White House occupancies (see "TUOL" posts 9/7/09, 7/23/09), but in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]