Search for: "C Publishing LLC" Results 301 - 320 of 1,613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2021, 7:19 am by Eric Goldman
Cameron Atkinson self-describes as “a Christian, a trial and appellate lawyer at Pattis & Smith, LLC, a former business consultant, a published constitutional scholar, and a general hell-raiser. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[6] The promulgation, modification, or revocation of permanent standards require a notice-and-comment rulemaking, which an ETS does not.[7] Before OSHA can issue an ETS, § 6(c)(1) requires that it make two heightened determinations: (A) [T]hat employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards, and (B) that such emergency standard is necessary to protect employees from such danger.[8]For… [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 3:37 pm by Stuart Kaplow
” Nancy Hudes and I are now publishing a new blog at www.ESGLegalSolutions.com (.. yes, this blog will continue). [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Jose (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1325, 1345 [my 11/12/13 post on which can be found here]; Clews Land & Livestock, LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 My presentation, galloping across a bunch of developments. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:43 am by Gene Takagi
Notice 2020-36 was published on May 18, 2020.Guidance on circumstances under which an LLC can qualify for recognition under §501(c)(3).Final regulations on §509(a)(3) supporting organizations. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post on the recent CJEU decision in the case of Peterson v Google LLC C-682/18 and C-683/18 – a copyright case which deals with the protections given hosting platforms by the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 4:58 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Survey respondents, more than half of whom are board members or c-suite executives, reported .. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes the allegations: Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 allege that when they were thirteen years old they were solicited and recruited for sex trafficking and manipulated into providing to a third-party sex trafficker pornographic videos (“the Videos”) of themselves through the social media platform Snapchat. [read post]