Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
In late February, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its long-awaited [the Opinion of Advocate General (AG) Bobek, on which see here, had been released in July 2019] judgment in Constantin Film, C-240/18 P, aka the Fack Ju Göhte case concerning the interpretation of the morality absolute ground in EU trade mark (EUTM) law.The decision is both interesting and important for a number of reasons, including trade mark law, the role of freedom of expression,… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
G 2/10, as I understand it, states that under more general conditions, the only thing that matters is that what is claimed in the end complies with A 123(2). [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:30 am
Benjamin C. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
By Thomas G. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:35 am
Justice Brown felt that he could not hear the matter without greater particularization of the accounts. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:03 pm
All rights reserved by Carl C. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
The disclaimer therefore met the requirements of G 1/03 and was allowable. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
However, after some time, C and G became concerned about how B was managing the estate. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
George G. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 11:03 am
In particular, the court found the degree of visual and phonetic similarity to be low (due to the element ‘G’ in the G-maxx mark and a perceived different pronunciation) and took into account a market survey where 52% of the participants indicated not to be confused by the different marks.Concluding in the sense of no infringement, the court dismissed the appeal in its entirety.CommentReflecting on this case, this Katfriend disagrees with several principal findings of… [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
The Defendants have not established that they are entitled to immunity as a matter of law under Section 9-30-6-6 against any civil claims Elliott might bring. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
This is the (final) decision in the case that led to decision G 2/10 of the Enlarged Board (EBA)Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:22 am
In her decision, Judge Huff granted Plaintiffs Rule 12(c) motions for judgment on the pleadings – ruling that all claims of the five asserted patents were invalid for claiming ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Facts: The trial court found that grounds for terminating respondents’ parental rights were established under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (c)(ii), (g), (j), and (l). [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 10:33 am
Le Meur, G. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
”The Court struck down FDA’s determination and sent the matter back to the agency. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe… [read post]
