Search for: "C. R.C. C." Results 301 - 314 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am by MBettman
McGowan was asked by her CTC patients and staff to continue this practice, which she felt constituted insurance fraud in violation of R.C. 2913.47. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] To assist its interpretation, Justice Côté referred to the Court’s decision in 62 Statutory enactments embody legislative will. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
App. 2007) (adopting Restatement Third §2(c) regarding warnings; “[a]bsent controlling Arizona law to the contrary, we generally follow the Restatement”); Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
You won’t find a  more thorough analysis  of every factor in a cybersquatting  case than this on. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
§ 924(c)(1)(B)(ii) that must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt as it is an element of the offense and not merely  a sentencing factor. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am by MBettman
”) R.C. 3702.303 (Written transfer agreement statute) (“(A) Except as provided in division (C) of this section, an ambulatory surgical facility shall have a written transfer agreement with a local hospital that specifies an effective procedure for the safe and immediate transfer of patients from the facility to the hospital when medical care beyond the care that can be provided at the ambulatory surgical facility is necessary, including when emergency situations occur… [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Charles Rowland
”  In the De Laudibus Legum Angliae, c. 1470, Sir John Fortescue argues that “one would much rather that twenty guilty person should escape the punishment of death, than that one innocent person should be condemned and suffer capitally. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
History: L. 1978, c. 95; amended 1980, c. 112, § 2; 1981, c. 290, § 18; 1995, c. 20, § 3; 2009, c. 283, § 2, eff. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
Last week we put up a post commenting on something that we thought was wrong with New Jersey law. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am by The Legal Blog
Justice LahotiThe Bench comprising Justice Thomas, Justice Mohapatra and Justice R.C. [read post]