Search for: "C. R.C. C."
Results 301 - 319
of 319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 1:27 pm
More specifically, the Court concluded that R.C. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:58 am
[*P27] "[C]oncepts of state property law are relevant, but not necessarily dispositive, for deciding the question whether there was a legitimate privacy interest for [F]ourth [A]mendment purposes. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
§ 2901.05(C)(2), (3). [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 2007 CA 00149, 2008-Ohio-4523 (no-law argument) In re Timothy C., 5th Dist. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 8:41 pm
(See R.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 1:04 pm
You can find the opinion online here: Search for Ellison or for the docket number: C-070875. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
R.C., a 16-page opinion, Judge Bradford writes:Appellant-Respondent H.R. [read post]
24 May 2008, 8:13 am
See, also, R.C. 2933.33(A) (providing that exigent circumstances exist and officers may conduct a warrantless search of a premises if they have probable cause to believe that the premises is being used for illegal manufacturing of methamphetamines). [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:27 am
"Both former R.C. 4121.80(H) and former 2950.09(C)(1) expressly make their provisions applicable to acts committed or facts in existence prior to their effective dates. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 2:08 am
C-030626, 2004 Ohio 4247. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 10:58 am
Specifically R.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 11:14 am
Ohio imposes an analogous duty to the Florida’s statue in R.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
R.C. 2935.03, State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]APPENDIX A IN THE CIRCUIT COURTOF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIALCIRCUIT IN AND FOR BREVARDCOUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-1991-7249-AXXXSTATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, o MARK DEAN SCHWAB, r Defendant. --------------~/ ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE OR STAY EXECUTION This matter came before the Court upon the Defendant's Motion to VacateSentence or Stay Execution. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:33 am
" This Court finds that R.C. 2933.33(A), while not applicable in the present case, is exceptionally persuasive authority. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:56 am
See R.C. 2901.01(A)(13)(a)-(k), 2933.43(C). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
You won’t find a more thorough analysis of every factor in a cybersquatting case than this on. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 7:41 am
C-040683 and C-040783 (January 19, 2005).APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, Nos. [read post]
7 Jun 2006, 6:38 am
On motion for admission prohac vice of David C. [read post]
