Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 301 - 320 of 2,376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
AB 5 modifies how workers are classified as employees or independent contractors for state law purposes and codifies the 2018 California Supreme Court decision known as Dynamex. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 2:37 pm by Joshua Henderson
This last suggestion may sound familiar to many California employers in light of recent state law changes. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
Supreme Court case is Sierra Chemical v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
State of California, IHSS, legally uninsured, administered by York Risk Services Group, a Sedgwick Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 2:30 pm by vera
Google’s request to the court in California is not surprising. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:20 am by William N. Hebert
In California, retailers are obligated to pay sales taxes to the state on their gross receipts, subject to certain exemptions. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
”[25]  A similar class action was recently dismissed from a San Francisco federal court in a case called O’Connor v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am by admin
by Dora Lane Dora Lane AB 5 (Codifies the “ABC” Test for Contractor Status) AB 5 codifies the “ABC” Test for determining contractor status which was adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
By Kerry Shapiro and Daniel Quinley On March 9, 2023, the US District Court for the Eastern District of California issued its ruling in Friends of the Inyo, et al., v. [read post]