Search for: "COCHRAN v STATE"
Results 301 - 320
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2009, 4:05 am
Laster v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Audry Linton v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Laster v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
[See the Board's February 2008 decision (TTABlogged here), sustaining Nextel's opposition to Motorola's application to register a 911 Hz chirp on the ground that it failed to function as a trademark.]January 14, 2009 - 10 AM: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Okay, so Martinez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:55 pm
State) there's not a lot to keep the egos in check. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Hernan Arquimides Ramos v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:42 pm
Juan Ramon Meza Segundo v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
As we stated in part I, the firms that had blogs tended to fall into two camps: Blog-Proud: These firms actually make it very easy to find their attorney's blogs. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:23 pm
Judges Price and Cochran concurred in the judgment without an opinion. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Because the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Fischer had shot his aunt with the stolen gun, it stood to reason that the State has provided enough evidence during the trial to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Fischer had stolen the gun.Judges Cochran and Johnson concurred only to note that Harrell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:03 pm
State. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:40 pm
Cir. 1998), and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
State. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
State. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
State, which reversed the Court of Appeals' disposition. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:35 am
Stephon Walter v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Northwestern University)Cochrane John (University of Chicago)Coleman John (Duke University)Constantinides George M. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 9:43 pm
State, 250 S.W.3d 96 (2008)(Cochran, J. dissenting) If history is any guide, it may not be pleasant for the State.. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
