Search for: "COOPER v. HOLDER"
Results 301 - 320
of 561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
The authors argue that copyright law has failed to support the creative industries in a digital world where it is socially acceptable to use and re-use content freely, instead favouring the rights holders and intermediaries. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:58 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:09 am
Furthermore, since Hadid smiled and posed for the photo, she contributed to the creativity and originality of the image, pointing to Rogers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
Califano v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of New York Times v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The courts, of course, followed by many academics, have a quite different view (Cooper v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:13 am
• Regulation 1383/2003 does not fulfil the reasonability standard set forth in GATTArticle V:4. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am
Moreover, the proclamation’s applicability only to non-visa-holders outside the United States puts it in the sweet spot of judicial deference to the political branches, as the Supreme Court showed in the travel ban case. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In Bell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
"That wording sounds even more like the "rebate" (a term rejected by Qualcomm) Apple says Qualcomm promised under a special cooperation agreement.There still isn't any indication of the arbitration panel having made a FRAND rate determination. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:13 am
Garland’s memo superseded Attorney General Eric Holder’s 2009 FOIA guidance, which the Trump Administration left in place. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:35 pm
In today’s decision in Generics (UK) v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
The IPKat is happy to host a guest contribution by Felipe Romero Moreno (University of Hertfordshire), based on a recent scholarly article available here, on the national transpositions of Article 17 of the Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market [Katposts here], which the European Parliament adopted a year ago today and which individual EU Member States will have time to transpose into their own legal systems by 7 June 2021.Here's what Felipe writes:‘Upload… [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
Most notably, in Kaplan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:33 am
Bank v. [read post]
