Search for: "Cable v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:33 am
The United States Geological Survey had installed the cable in 1934 to collect water samples and streamflow measurements. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 8:37 am
Plaintiff sues Reid in New York federal court.The case is La Liberta v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:05 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:37 am
June 20, 2016) (this is the second of two purported collective and class actions brought under the FLSA and state wage and hour laws alleging that defendant misclassified cable installation technicians as independent contractors and failed to pay overtime and minimum wage). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
" A claim of false advertising may be based on at at least one of two theories (Time Warner Cable v DIRECTV (2007)):that the challenged ad is literally falsethat the ad, while not literally false, is nevertheless likely to mislead or confuse consumersThe claimant must demonstrate that the false or misleading representation involved an inherent or material quality of the product and that the injuries to be redressed are the result of "public deception" (Johnson &… [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:52 pm
Illinois Emcasco Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 6:44 am
The only relevant case law found on this point was Marin v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:42 pm
Time Warner Cable News reported on developments.Federal Government: On Friday, the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
But not the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
Cheney v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:59 pm
EDF Renewable Energy, Appellant v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:13 am
There’s also of course the difference between the state of affairs when the statute was passed (e.g., before Netflix) to the changing landscape of content consumption today. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:32 am
But when it comes to a free, independent, and vibrant press (I'm tempted to say uninhibited and robust also, to quote NYT v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:39 am
First, the common carrier problem: in National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
A win for the plutocracy* Yesterday’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:43 am
The high court heard oral arguments Oct. 9 in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
