Search for: "California Insurance"
Results 301 - 320
of 19,762
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Last week's post by Chase Mathis about California Insurable Interest made me think, "we've written about Insurable interest issues in California before. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California in Flintkote Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
These are: the terms of the particular insurance policy at issue, case law that controls in this area and California State Insurance Statutes. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:59 am
Wells Fargo is in hot water again, this time with the state of California. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 2:15 pm
The reality facing many people in California, however, is that insurance does not automatically mean providers are available. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:30 pm
Well, it turns out the state's Department of Insurance has deemed the insurance company’s rates excessive, which has prompted State Farm to issue $13.3 million in refunds to many of its California customers. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:20 pm
An unpublished opinion issued by a California Appellate Court addressed issues concerning confidentiality and privileged statements made by accident victims to their own insurance companies. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
On September 14, 2012, California Assembly Bill 2084, relating to Blanket Insurance Policies, was signed into law. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
Last week, a court in California ruled against Mercury Insurance Company which challenged an earlier order from the California Insurance Commissioner requiring it to reduce homeowner insurance rates. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:11 am
“Healthcare reform raises the stakes in California insurance commissioner election. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
A Fontana, California man was arrested on insurance fraud charges in early February following an investigation conducted by the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Workers Compensation Insurance Fraud Unit. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:37 pm
In 2012, the California legislature passed California Insurance Code §10110.6, which provides that all discretionary clauses in California insurance contracts are null and void, if the insurance policy or plan “renewed” as of January 1, 2012. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:08 am
The National Law Journal has an article today predicting litigation in the wake of the California fires, and recalling the legal aftermath of the southern California wildfires of 2003, when "homeowners filed about 200 lawsuits against insurance companies, primarily for... [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:53 am
On February 6, 2023, The Claims Journal highlighted a letter by members of Hunton’s insurance team, submitted on behalf of United Policyholders, to the California Supreme Court, which alerts the Court to the fundamental infirmities in the “standard” expounded by the insurance industry in COVID-19 business interruption litigations nationwide. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm
GAP insurance generally refers to third party insurance purchased by a consumer in a separate transaction from the actual vehicle purchase, typically as added coverage to their auto insurance. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
Many of the newly introduced bills would affect insurers doing business in California. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 7:19 pm
Premiums for employer-based health insurance in California have increased by 40% in the last six years. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:37 am
By statute, California law holds that willful misconduct—where an insured intends to cause someone harm—is not insurable as a matter of public policy. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
Case law in California generally protects an “innocent insured” even if they are head over feet with the not so innocent insured. [read post]
