Search for: "California v. Camp" Results 301 - 320 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 1:26 pm by Deborah Wald
The most notorious of these cases was Nancy S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm by Joe Patrice
[Law and More] * If you stop to think about it, someone should totally have sued the camp from The Parent Trap (affiliate link). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
But they should not be obligated to do so.Lemley-Shapiro paper promotes Google's preferred arbitration method and reflects unconcealed anti-Apple, anti-Microsoft biasTwo well-known California professors, Stanford's Mark Lemley (patent law) and Berkeley's Carl Shapiro (competition economics), have published a pro-Google policy paper on FRAND rate-setting styled as an academic working paper, entitled "A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents". [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Two theories, each supported by its own venerable camp. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
Perry, the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:39 pm by Andrew Weber
  On Tuesday, March 26, 2013, the Court heard arguments in the California Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
  What sort of sentence would we give someone who, say, (1) was an adult, (2) who dresses up as a police officer, goes to a youth camp, and methodically shoots and kills 69 people, mostly children, and then (3) smiles about it and is utterly remorseless? [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rory Little
Jones and California Department of Corrections v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am by Florian Mueller
End-runs based on new products rarely ever work.But so far the Android camp hasn't won much against Apple (and Apple also has miles to go, but it's been more successful than its adversaries and now has a lot of momentum after the California verdict).1.1 Samsung's existing injunctionsSamsung has won a ruling that it's entitled to damages (at a FRAND level), but was categorically denied injunctive relief, over a 3G-essential patent in the Netherlands. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Jim von der Heydt
  It is, in fact, impossible to conceive how it could have done so more overtly than in Bush v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:09 pm by Cynthia Godsoe
communism, which partially underlies the Supreme Court’s grant of strong individual parental rights in Meyer v. [read post]