Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 301 - 320
of 34,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
South African courts generally will not apply foreign procedural law when adjudicating disputes and the California court processes do not run through South African territory. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Vermont Law School, Inc., No. 21-2904 (2d. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
The Supreme Court decision is Sheetz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
A fascinating legal soap opera is now underway following a trial just completed in California. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:45 am
Press, 2024) [open access]- Scroll to p. 215Queering Displacement: The State of the Ukrainian LGBTQ+ Community During the Russian Full-Scale Invasion (Global Public Policy Institute, April 2024) [text via ReliefWeb]"The Sixth Ground: Why Adding Gender/Sexuality to the Grounds for Asylum Would Better Serve the Needs of LGBT Asylum Seekers," Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, vol. 38, no. 1 (Fall 2023) [full-text]- Focuses on the US.Transgender Immigrants in California… [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 4:52 pm
Footnotes[+] Footnotes ↑1 Strain v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Circuit’s long-awaited decision is State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:23 am
The case is entitled Carter v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:15 pm
At a Thursday news conference, civil rights attorney V. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
As a reminder for those familiar, the acts that trigger an excise tax include: (i) taxes on the private foundation’s net investment income,[15] (ii) prohibitions on self-dealing transactions,[16] (iii) failure to make the required five percent (5%) qualifying distributions to charities,[17] (iv) prohibition on excess business holdings,[18] (v) prohibition on holding jeopardizing investments,[19] and (vi) taxable expenditures,[20] none of which apply to a 501(c)(4).[21] Despite the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Han v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
The court found that the California law was inconsistent with the federal arbitration law’s broad mandate that courts enforce arbitration agreements. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
As SCOTUS explained in Sec'y of State of Md. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Also, see Contract Services Employee Trust v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
