Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 301 - 320
of 4,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2021, 3:28 pm
Waremart Foods v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
Further, even after recreational marijuana was legalized in the state in 2016, a 2018 California Supreme court ruling in Ross v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:09 am
From a brief filed by the California Attorney General's office in Ogilvie v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Today marks 125 years since the birth of Earl Warren, the 14th Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, in Los Angeles, California. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:29 pm
Trademarks also offer clear and enforceable legal rights, allowing brands to block competitors from adopting similar marks that mislead customers. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:16 am
Kleffman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 12:24 pm
(Equilon Enterprises v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:27 pm
I was surprised to see a case today captioned "People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 10:47 pm
Rev. 199 (2008) Mark A. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:18 am
" Tea Board of India v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:40 pm
The video of the June 6 oral argument in California's Proposition 66 case, Briggs v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:52 am
Professor Mark A. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:15 am
Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides and Barnerd, LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:56 pm
On December 17, 2010, in Duran v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
Marks, No. 05-30218 (6-13-08). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
California Highway Patrol (WCAB—ADJ13285870) Permanent Disability—Rating—Lifetime Cap on Award for Same Body Regions—WCAB, denying reconsideration, affirmed WCJ’s award of 43 percent permanent disability for industrial injuries to applicant’s low back, heart (hypertension)… Richter (Mark) v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:27 pm
Inc. v. 3D Labs Inc., No. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:02 pm
The California District Court dismissed Facebook’s case against Teachbook, ruling that Teachbook did not “expressly aim” its infringing conduct at the [northern California] forum. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:30 am
District Court for Central District of California, seeking review under Section 1071(b) of the TTAB's decision in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
