Search for: "California v. Russell" Results 301 - 320 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Russell of the Washington, D.C., firm of Goldstein & Russell, with thirty minutes of time. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Brian Russell and Dan Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2016 Annual CEQA update. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
In Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Bauman, holding that the automaker could not be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its foreign subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am by Kiran Bhat
  [Disclosure:  Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents respondent IMS Health in the case.] [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Keisha Russell weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that a California city prevailed yesterday in its effort to avoid Supreme Court review of a regulatory-takings case, in 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
The Court will also hear oral arguments in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
The first grant came in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s oral argument in Daimler AG v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
 Other coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Kevin Russell discusses yesterday’s opinion in Kawashima v. [read post]