Search for: "California v. Russell"
Results 301 - 320
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:07 am
Sheaffer v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Department of Agriculture, and (2) whether the California Unclaimed Property Law violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it deprives owners of th [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
” Coverage of Murr v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 7:16 am
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
California Teachers Association made it look like a nearly 40-year-old decision called Abood v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
California Teachers Association for the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Brian Russell and Dan Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2015 Annual CEQA update. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Enviratrands, Inc. and Russell F. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:32 am
California Teachers Association. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 3:40 am
In Bank Markazi v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
California Teachers Association, the challenge to mandatory “fair share” fees for public employees who are represented by a union but decline to join that union. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
Let’s talk about Friedrichs v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:06 pm
Perhaps the vigor of the Court’s resolution of DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:55 pm
’” At the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief that the State and Local Legal Center filed in Heffernan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary on Monday’s opinion in DIRECTV v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
