Search for: "Chicago City Day School v. City of Chicago" Results 301 - 320 of 398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by Erin Miller
City of Chicago, the city of Chicago has announced what “city officials say is the strictest handgun ordinance in the United States,” which would ban all handguns outside the home and all gun shops within the city. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
For many years, Sandra Day O’Connor chose to open the questioning in most cases, and thus show the lawyers—and her colleagues—which way she, as the Court’s swing vote, was leaning. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:02 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
City of Chicago: [T]he only Justice not to write from [the February] sitting is Justice Alito.... [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:22 pm
City of Chicago and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
” At the School Law Blog at Education Week (via How Appealing), Mark Walsh covers the Court’s denial of cert. in Pontiac School District v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
City of Chicago; the ruling, it explains, “could give a chance at relief to minority groups, women, the elderly[,] the disabled and others claiming to be victims of a discriminatory employment practice long after the practice went into effect. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
Paul, which struck down a city ordinance banning certain “bias-motivated” conduct. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
  The challenge is to a City of Chicago ban on handguns that is very similar to the one the Court struck down in the Heller case, involving the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
City of Chicago (08-974) Argued: Feb. 22, 2010 Issue: Whether, where an employer adopts an employment practice that discriminates against African Americans in violation of Title VII’s disparate impact provision, a plaintiff must file an EEOC charge within 300 days after the announcement of the practice, or whether the plaintiff may file a charge within 300 days after the employer’s use of the discriminatory practice. [read post]