Search for: "Church v. Grant County"
Results 301 - 320
of 531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 12:25 am
(Pugh v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am
As the Court ruled in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:52 pm
Perdue lawsuit and HB-908.Whitaker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:37 am
(Schofield v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:27 am
Cleveland v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Ed. 2d 151, 162-66 (1976); Presbyterian Church v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 6:13 am
The style of the case is, United States Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
In January 2021, the Harvest Rock Church and South Bay United Pentecostal Church challenged California's restrictions on in-person gatherings and singing during worship. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
Link: Read The Opinion Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:48 am
Goodson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
This post examines a recent opinion from the Supreme Court, Genesee County, New York: Vega v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:36 am
The seminal case dealing with application of the actual use doctrine to exempt entities is the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Dade County Taxing Authorities v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:36 am
The seminal case dealing with application of the actual use doctrine to exempt entities is the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Dade County Taxing Authorities v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Both County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
” Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Baton Rouge v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
" In Old Paths Baptist Church v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Attorney General declined to appeal Wrenn v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
Gomba Holdings (UK) Ltd v Minories Finance Ltd (No 2) [1993] Ch 171 and Church Commissioners v Ibrahim [1997] EGLR 13 are authority for the proposition that, where a party has a contractual right to costs, the court should normally give effect to that right, albeit with “anxious scrutiny” of those costs: O’Beirne v Hudson [2010] EWCA Civ 52. [read post]
