Search for: "Circuit Check IncĀ " Results 301 - 320 of 2,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 3:34 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Apple, Inc., case number 15-17382, the Ninth Circuit requested that the California Supreme Court decide, as a matter of California law, whether time spent by Apple retail employees undergoing required security checks on Apple’s premises constituted “hours worked” under Wage Order 7, even though the packages, bags and technology devices checked were brought to work purely for employees’ convenience (slip op. available here). [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 am by Jonathan Bailey
Check out our Consulting Website [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
The Third Circuit, Sept. 1, upheld by 2-1 confiscation in New Jersey in Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs Inc v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:24 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Last week, the CFPB filed its supplemental brief with the Ninth Circuit in Seila Law and its supplemental en banc brief with the Fifth Circuit in All American Check Cashing. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:11 am by New York Civil Law
  Finally, it is also nice to see a court other than the Second Circuit certify questions to the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc., 72 N.E.3d 908, 913 (Ind.2017) and Hunt (Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 1:22 pm by New York Civil Law
  Finally, it is also nice to see a court other than the Second Circuit certify questions to the New York Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:48 am by Lyle Roberts
  And the PSLRA neither allows nor requires us to check our disbelief at the door. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am by Bona Law PC
And this is precisely why there is such a debate among district courts––and even circuit appellate courts–– as to how much context is necessary to prove an agreement, and what a claim based on circumstantial evidence requires to be plausible, in the absence of direct evidence. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
To Save Non-AmEx Retailers’ Steering SuitLaw360 – August 11, 2020 (subscription required) A group of antitrust law professors are backing retailers at the Second Circuit that are looking to revive claims that ​​​​American Express’ anti-steering rules have increased the costs they incur when accepting other credit cards. [read post]