Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional, et al. v. United States, et al."
Results 301 - 320
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994) (stating broadly that “[i]t is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence,” including when “any constitutional violation has been committed by a law enforcement official”); Peterson v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[xiii] The federal civil rights statute is Section 1983 within Title 42 of the United States Code. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
(a) It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks and other public-safety threats. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Although class analysis as such plays a relatively minimal role in her overall argument, save for when she denounces the role of the Koch Brothers and the implications of Citizens United, the realities of my racial and gender identity are front and center throughout the book. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
EXEMPTIONS Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
Plaintiffs-appellees, Gopi Vedachalam and Kangana Beri, are Indian citizens who were employees of defendants-appellants Tata America International Corporation, et al., an Indian corporation and its affiliates (collectively, "TCS"). [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:22 pm
Miller, et al. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Planning and Conservation League, et al v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Or consider another example: in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/cqz Father M, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
And the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Humboldt County, et al. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:28 am
See also, for a recent review of climate change liability around the world, Climate Change Liability: Transnational Law and Practice, Richard Lord, et al (eds.) [read post]
