Search for: "City of New York v. U. S" Results 301 - 320 of 802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 {**3 Misc 3d at 343}& Dev. of City of N.Y. v Koenigsberg, 133 Misc 2d 893 [Civ Ct, NY County 1986]; Ford Motor Credit Co. v Bobo, 1 Misc 3d 901[A], 2003 NY Slip Op 51464[U] [Nassau Dist Ct, Miller, J.].) [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:30 am
The conference takes place in three major cities: New York, Chicago, and San Francisco in October, November, and December of each year. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am by Ashoka Mukpo
Vijayakumar Thraissigiam at home in New York City, February 2020.Ashoka Mukpo for the ACLU.Thuraissigiam has a gentle demeanor but he speaks in taut, short sentences and has an air of weariness. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The movant has the initial burden of proving entitlement to summary judgment (Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Borges v Placeres  2018 NY Slip Op 28224  Decided on June 27, 2018  Civil Court Of The City Of New York, New York County  Ramseur, J. is a wonderful example. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:44 am
 Of course, we could echo Justice Scalia's words about Bush v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf talks to “DACA recipients working in the health care field in California, Florida, Texas and in the suburbs of New York City, where the coronavirus has hit hardest. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:53 pm
Corp., 10 Misc 3d 145[A], 2006 NY Slip Op 50139[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2006]), and the holding in New York Hosp. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
  Since the Civil Court should not have considered any facts set forth, or exhibits referred to, in said affirmation (see Pisacreta, 265 AD2d 540), plaintiff failed to proffer any evidence in admissible form which raised an issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), and has now been so broadly interpreted by some lower courts as to provide fodder for mischief of the kind manifested by the court below. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Westside Federal Savings & Loan Association of New York City v Fitzgerald, 136 AD2d 699, 699 [2d Dept 1988]; see also e.g. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
Distinguishing between an individual's "domicile" and his or her "residence"Campaniello v New York State Div. of Tax Appeals Trib., 2018 NY Slip Op 03400, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFrom time to time an applicant for public employment or an employee is required to be "domiciled"* with the physical jurisdiction of the employer. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am by Peter Mahler
The court in Friedman applied the so-called “Burford abstention” doctrine to dismiss a complaint seeking statutory dissolution of a New York corporation, without prejudice to its re-commencement in state court. [read post]