Search for: "Clark v. Secretary of State"
Results 301 - 320
of 369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
.); and (v) Art & Science – the many ways of epistemic insights.He has been awarded grants by German states for development of new ways in teaching functional illiterates mathematics, together with Marie-Cecile Bertau for her Gilgamesh project, as well as for his Theory of Trust project. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:18 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 to 18 January 2011 Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear Duncombe and others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:48 pm
United States * Former President of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund * Counsel to the Warren Commission Mr. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
Emcare, Inc., 444 F.3d 403, 409-12 (5th Cir.2006) (finding § 541.304‘s language is ambiguous and resorting to DOL for interpretative guidance); Clark v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, Mr Jonathan Djanogly, replied for the Government. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:28 am
Supreme Court Chaytor & Ors, R v (Rev 2) [2010] UKSC 52 (01 December 2010) Spiller & Anor v Joseph & Ors [2010] UKSC 53 (01 December 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mullings v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2820 (01 December 2010) Webster v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2819 (01 December 2010) SB, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2620 (27 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) International Management Group (UK) Ltd v German & Anor [2010]… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:58 am
Ken Clarke: jury-less trials in extreme cases to continue – BBC: Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke has said (click the link to watch a video) it is “unlikely” that the use of juryless trials “in extreme cases” will be scrapped. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
In this regard, he refers to the control order case of Home Secretary v AP (No.2) [2010] 1 WLR 1652, [2010] UKSC 26, in which the anonymity of a successful appellant against a control order was continued. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
In respect of the former, he noted that s.1(3) of the National Health Services Act 2006 and the Secretary of States’ National Framework Document [46-49] provided that eligibility for NHS treatment was based on an individual’s assessed needs, and not on an ability to pay. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
The “Daily Mail’s” report of this, under the headline “ Clarke hits greedy solicitors as he scraps no win, no fee deals” is an interesting spin on the Justice Secretary’s comment. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
The Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, did not do as he was obliged to do under the Convention, ensure that the Justice Secretary, Jack Straw gave all the citizens of the UK their human rights under the Convention. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MH, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1112 (14 October 2010) Nouri v Marvi & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1107 (14 October 2010) Norbrook Laboratories Ltd & Anor v Carr & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1108 (14 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Inglis v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2269 (14 October 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Howden, R (on the… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:11 pm
Rev. 1747, 1761 (2004)).18 Nevada Secretary of State, Why Incorporate in Nevada, available at http://nvsos.gov/index.aspx? [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:35 am
CA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2278 (10 September 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a a control order which required the “controlee” to relocate and live at an address in Ipswich, away from his family in Crawley, was unlawful. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:53 am
Under the Ker-Frisbie doctrine – and as approved more recently in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:57 am
This could ultimately cost the UK a lot of money in compensation payments, although it is of note that the court has did not award compensation in Hirst or the more recent case of Frodl v Austria, The coalition government will be wary of the European Court of Human Rights’ recently acquired new powers to punish intransigent states. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
Nor was it legitimate to promote the public law duty of the school, not giving rise to a private law action, to a duty under section 6 of the HRA remediable by a claim in damages (R (Holub) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 WLR 1359 at 1367). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
Future public inquiries could now be under threat as new Justice Secretary Ken Clarke has accused the Lord Saville of allowing the process to get “ludicrously out of hand“. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Holtom, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 934 (20 April 2010) Valentas & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 200 (03 February 2010) Clarke, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 684 (11 February 2010) R, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 194 (02 February 2010) R, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 907 (14 April 2010) Attorney Generals Reference No. 112 of 2009 (Church) [2010] EWCA Crim 351 (10 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary… [read post]
