Search for: "Clemente v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 5:26 pm
The candidate is currently the elected City Attorney of the second largest City in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:22 am
United States, 525 F.3d 1139 (Fed. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
The measure at issue is nearly identical to the ban in federal law struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
United States on April 25. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
The Court has not requested the views of the United States in Christopher. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
As the nation increasingly embraces the constitutional amendment solution to Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
EPA and United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Clement, now in private practice in Washington with the Bancroft law firm. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:22 pm
City of San Clemente, No. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, and Florida v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
United States (No. 11-182), the state’s appeal of an April 2011 opinion by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that blocked implementation of several key provisions in the law popularly known at “S.B. 1070. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Wednesday’s oral argument in PPL Montana v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm
See United States’ and Intervenors’ Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (Doc. 108) at 2, No. 1:11-cv-01303 (D.D.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
-Scott Clements, Reserve Studies Inc. [read post]
