Search for: "Coke v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 5:05 pm
I am hardly in a position to dispute Professor Leiter's evaluation of the quality of my scholarship, both because I haven't seen it, and because, as I believe Freidrich Nietzsche observed (or perhaps it was Lord Coke), no man should be a judge in his own case. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
In 1982 in a case called R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:51 pm
Co., v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
Coke. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
Title: Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:54 am
Mason et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:03 am
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Midland Central Appraisal District v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:18 am
See Mason v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
This argument failed, and Mr Coke-Wallis’ membership of the Institute was suspended. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 pm
More: ABA Journal; City of Livonia Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:49 am
V, dated 14th July, 1923, page 260)30. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
Even poorly educated consumers can distinguish Coke and Pepsi in the marketplace and will not be confused if a Pepsi ad appears in response to a keyword search for Coke. [read post]
