Search for: "Com. v. Call, D." Results 301 - 320 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2020, 7:28 am by José Guillermo
Con estas obras podemos apreciar la angustia y trauma que puede generar en un ciudadano común, las eternas batallas judiciales y burocráticas con que lidiamos los abogados día a día, pues el ciudadano no las entiende. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
  Déjà vu all over again. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
  This wasn’t a close call. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:59 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
por Mariana Iriarte MastronardoAbogada y profesora de la Universidad de Puerto Rico, Recinto de Río Piedras En días recientes el Tribunal Supremo certificó una decisión con un gran impacto en el quehacer democrático y político del país. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:49 am
”   Whether it’s the correct decision is a closer call. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:33 pm by Allan Blutstein
Supp. 921 (1978), aff’d 636 F.2d 472, 486-88 (D.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, any corporation that mails material to customers, or deals with them through phone calls, would have to comply with the laws of those places (for instance, in deciding what it must do to legally record phone calls with customers[13]). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
§ 20913(d) (formerly 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:16 am by Russ Bensing
  I’ve tried cases in front of him, and I’d say he was fair, although in his calls, ties went to the prosecution. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:31 am by John L. Welch
Near the bottom, that poster includes the wording "For more info log on to www.littelconcepts.net, WWWV-103.com, or call 404-607-8772. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
  Turns out the 8th District had one of each in the same week, the latter coming in State v. [read post]