Search for: "Com. v. Will, T."
Results 301 - 320
of 3,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm
Hosp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:15 am
Se trata de la terminación del procedimiento sancionador por conformidad anticipada y pago rebajado contemplada en el art.85 de la Ley 39/2015, de 1 de octubre, de procedimiento administrativo común. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:22 am
Esos daños no se configuran como lesiones, en el sentido técnico-jurídico propio de la responsabilidad extracontractual de la Administración. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
Com. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
As reported on Law360.com, “a California federal judge on Tuesday tossed two suits alleging Princess Cruise Lines put passengers in danger of contracting COVID-19, finding the passengers can’t recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress just because they were afraid of contracting the virus. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
, ¿Como ampliar las vías de comunicación conectando a todo el País o por lo menos tener un plan que proyecte y lo garantice? [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
V. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
V. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
" But she didn't. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am
Greg Stohr reports at Bloomberg that “[t]he U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 11:30 am
Procesalmente solo restaría la firma de la gobernadora, Wanda Vázquez Garced, para que se convierta en ley. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 12:16 am
” Centra la queja de los recurrentes apreciando el alcance del perjuicio que supone la modificación de las bases de la convocatoria : elimina la posibilidad de solicitar presencialmente la adjudicación de plaza mediante el derecho a comparecencia de la persona solicitante o de su representante legal, en los términos previstos en la Ley 39/2015, de 1 de octubre, del Procedimiento Administrativo Común de las Administraciones Públicas… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
The USPTO has had a long-standing position where the inclusion of ".com" with a generic word would render that mark as generic and therefore ineligible for registration. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
The USPTO has had a long-standing position where the inclusion of ".com" with a generic word would render that mark as generic and therefore ineligible for registration. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
The USPTO has had a long-standing position where the inclusion of ".com" with a generic word would render that mark as generic and therefore ineligible for registration. [read post]
