Search for: "Commissioner v. Smith"
Results 301 - 320
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
Mo. 1937) (prosecuting election commissioners that conspired to injure voters’ rights by counting certain votes for a different candidate); United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd, heard 26th June 2023. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
On Wednesday 17th May the Court will hand-down judgment in Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v SSE Generation Ltd [2023] UKSC 17. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Iain Duncan Smith announced new benefits rules, which will apply from March. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 10/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:59 am
Mathews v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Smith, The tax-exempt status of the NCAA: has the IRS fumbled the ball? [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 17/03/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/03/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 16 July 2020 the CJEU handed down judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland, Case-311/18 – generally known as “Schrems II”. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Commissioner of Social Security Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0312p.06 2008/08/22 Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
In contrast, on Free Dominion, the second and third defendants had a post entitled “6 ways Baglow v Smith helped save the Internets! [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
On 9 February 2024, there was a hearing in The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Dr Robert Milton & Amy Louise Spencer KB-2023-004745. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:50 am
B is for Baglow v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Smith v ADVFN plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) – 13 Dec 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am
In our recent paper, we critique Abbott’s proposal whilst contemplating AI’s status as property or person.It is perhaps most interesting to compare the contrasting fortunes of the Project’s filings in Australia (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879) and England and Wales (Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat)/Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021]… [read post]
