Search for: "Commonwealth v. Cross" Results 301 - 320 of 544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Imperial Oil Ltd. and sometimes this rule is referred to as the rule in Commonwealth Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
This Court chooses to apply comparison of two elements- a court order made known to the defendant and willful violation of that order as ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:18 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Another Spam Litigation Factory Unravels –- Beyond Systems v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
A claim for relief pursuant to this rule includes those set forth in a complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party pleading. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
(cross-petition asks for recourse on failure to dance). [read post]
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am by Tom Miller
The Commonwealth has appealed the ruling to the Appeals Court, where the case is currently pending. [read post]