Search for: "Commonwealth v. Major" Results 301 - 320 of 941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
Supreme Court gave its judgment in the case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am by ronaldrichenburg
Supreme Court gave its judgment in the case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
H.AMDT.619 to H.R.2499 Amendment to allow supporters of the commonwealth status quo the option of voting their preference during the second stage of the plebiscite. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins, Esq.FOLEY, COMERFORD & CUMMINSScranton, PAEvery so often in Pennsylvania jurisprudence, an appellate court criminal law decision comes along that could serve to have a substantial impact on the litigation of Pennsylvania personal injury matters.For instance, in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by Toby Heytens
In fact, my own state (the commonwealth of Virginia) has had a right-to-work law on the books for more than 70 years that prohibits precisely the sort of fees whose constitutionality was challenged in Janus v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am by The Charge
  However, Bailey - and specifically Justice Scalia's concurrence - calls the SJC's ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Hughes concurred in the result only, while Justice Wright filed a separate dissenting opinion (Kentucky Restaurant Association v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Seventhly, OBG has been understood to impose a dealing requirement by the courts both in this country and elsewhere in the Commonwealth, such as New Zealand, Singapore, Australia and Canada. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Superior Court in Mangel relied on its own 2011 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]