Search for: "Competitor Group, Inc. "
Results 301 - 320
of 1,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 9:46 am
By Jason Rantanen Billups-Rothenberg, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:46 am
(c) Legal Expert Connections, Inc., 866-417-7025 www.legalexpertconnections.com [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
The case is Matrix Basement Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
" By "these," he was, by way of an email to others at the company, referring to a small group of pharmaceutical drugs the rights to which Lundbeck was in the process of acquiring from Merck, including Indocin IV. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:06 am
In Bertico Inc, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
As Grumpy Cat would say: Case citation: Reflex Media, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:25 am
As restated by the Court, the defendant's argument was:its challenged articles are not "unpatented" [as required for a false marking claim] because they practice a once-existing, but now-expired, patent.The Court explained that the Federal Circuit's Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:30 am
The defendant, a regional airline company, Mesa Air Group, Inc., was sued by a bankrupt competitor for an alleged breach of a confidentiality agreement. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
The initial patent had run out, but the U.S. licensee — Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
Despite Setbacks, Department of Justice Charges Full Speed Ahead in Litigating Labor Antitrust Cases
2 May 2022, 8:46 am
DaVita Inc., et al., DOJ alleged that DaVita and Mr. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:59 am
Penney, Inc. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:00 pm
* Swatch Group v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
In Fox Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts When does using a competitor’s trademark as a hashtag create a false impression of association? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
Crafco and Cimline are competitors in roadway construction. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:19 pm
As previously reported in the Blog, Judge Sullivan in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, surprised many antitrust lawyers by granting applications from a number of competitors and consumer groups and commencing extensive proceedings under the amended Tunney Act to review the consent decree reflecting Department of Justice approval of the merger between SBC and AT&T. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:18 pm
Niloo / Shutterstock.com In Hallmark Cards Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Munchkin, Inc., 2016 WL 1276450, No. 14-cv-1308 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
It also sold Dow’s competitors’ products. [read post]
