Search for: "Constitution Party of South Dakota"
Results 301 - 320
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
The Act passed along party lines in March 2010. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
§ 2254 (Dkt. 1); the response filed in opposition thereto (Dkt. 7); Petitioner’s Reply (Dkt. 11); the parties’ Supplemental Memoranda (Dkts. 25, 31, 36); and the Amicus Brief filed in support of Petitioner. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Davis (1937) and South Dakota v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:24 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:52 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am
South Dakota has an attorney general with backbone. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
And, in support of this argument, the constitutional principle they invoke is that the statute is unduly “coercive,” because of the dependency the States and their constituents have come to have on federal carrots. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:32 am
Suffice it to say, the issue is whether the expansion of Medicaid eligibility in the ACA, which the parties agree would be severable from the rest of the bill if the minimum essential coverage provision were invalidated, itself violates the Tenth Amendment by "coercing" the states--along the lines Chief Justice Rehnquist hinted at in his majority opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
Legislatures Coming Into Session NONE Legislatures Going Out of Session South Dakota 3/19 Floor/Committee Activity of Note March 19 Missouri Senate Floor SB 676 Mandates that any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling shall be unenforceable if based on a foreign law that does not grant the parties the same rights as the parties have under the United States and Missouri constitutions. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Yesterday (March 12) South Dakota’s governor signed into law HB 1253 which reads “No court, administrative agency, or other governmental agency may enforce any provisions of any religious code. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
South Dakota’s heavily modified version (“No court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative mediation or enforcement authority may render any judgment predicated on any religious code or enforce any provisions of any religious code. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:08 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Legislatures Coming Into Session Utah 1/23/12 Minnesota 1/24/12 Committee Activity of Note January 23 South Dakota House Judiciary Committee HB 1064 Allows the Supreme Court to establish certain rules for the use of interactive audio visual equipment and to provide for the collection and deposit of fees for the use thereof. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:53 am
The shortcoming of this approach was most clearly shown in the effort in South Dakota, where despite a high level of low-intensity public support shown in polls, the establishment united to discredit it and the proponents lacked the resources to counter that. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
Krueger marketed fancaster.com online on a few sports-oriented websites and those of several local pubs but testified that most of Fancaster's marketing efforts had not been geared toward the Internet, but rather had taken place at sporting events, bars, on local television channels in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Sioux City, Iowa, on radio stations in Charleston, South Carolina, and via flyers and handbills. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:57 am
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
