Search for: "Cooper v. Harris"
Results 301 - 320
of 450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) is a trade agreement putatively designed to encourage trans-border cooperation to fight counterfeiting. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
Second, as I noted earlier, the SCOTUS's decision in Independent Living Center v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:40 pm
Co-authored by George Preonas and Hayley Macon On July 23, 2012, in Harris v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:56 am
So Anderson Cooper is gay. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Keith Tallon Cook Taylor Caroline Landes McMillan Williams Helen MacDonald Aitken Associates Martin Wray Aitken Associates Kelly Wild Aitken Associates Peter Harris Harris Temperley Caron Theobalds Harris Temperley Stewart Hughan Harris Temperley Nina Shaw Harris Temperley Philip Wilkins Hudgell & Partners Elizabeth Bendall Sternberg Reed Gordon Reed Sternberg Reed Darren Ward Sternberg Reed Jenny Morrison Morrison… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
Harris County, supra.According to Mata, he “objected to this `unlawful intrusion into the Harris County computer system,’” but Sheriff Garcia and Dyess ordered him to cooperate. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
New Mexico: the Sagebrush Rebellion as un-cooperative federalism. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am
Harris Cnty., 529 U.S. 576, 588 (2000) (declining to defer to an agency’s interpretation, contained in an opinion letter, of an unambiguous regulation); Auer v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:00 am
Then President Harry S. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Harris First American Financial v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:51 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
In FAA v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Cooper, Missouri v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Rev. 117-212 (2011).Harris, Michael Ray. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:38 pm
See also Cooper v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
