Search for: "Corporation v Levi" Results 301 - 320 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
Plaintiff used a premium finance company, Standard Funding Corporation, to make the annual premium payment, and the finance agreement listed SJ International Brokers as the insured's agent. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm by Marina Chafa
  [06.07.19 Leesburg]  Deckers Outdoor Corporation, owner of the well-known “UGG” trademark (U.S. [read post]
29 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 132 v Newton , an owner installed a new garage door and front slab door with glass panels – though the owner had exclusive use of their garage door and front door, the doors were nonetheless common elements. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued November 12, 2009 Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
  Effective July 1, 2020, the corporate franchise tax levied on small business corporations is suspended, including the initial tax levied on corporations or other entities for the first accounting period in which the entity becomes subject to the corporation franchise tax.[8] This suspension applies to small business corporations for taxable franchise periods beginning between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:14 am
Stout, Cornell Law School, on Thursday, May 4, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas:  ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
 Last week, Justice Kornreich released her 32-page decision in Zelouf International Corp. v Zelouf, 2014 NY Slip Op 51462(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Oct. 6, 2014], fixing the fair value of the 25% stock interest at $2.2 million and awarding additional “damages” of another $2.2 million on the “quasi-derivative” claims for waste and self-dealing. [read post]