Search for: "Corporation v Levi" Results 301 - 320 of 620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
A Canadian cloud makes every email and download abroad subject to CASL -> Competitive Keyword Advertising Permitted As Nominative Use–ElitePay Global v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
-- Could the Religious-Liberty Principle that Catholics Established in Perez v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:09 am by CBA Futures
” I propose some answers to that question: Differential entity-licensing fees: Where the differences seek to encourage provision of low-income A2J services or to penalize failure to provide; Redistributive entity-licensing fees: Where a universal fee is set high enough to permit revenue to be redistributed by the regulator to entities that target improving low-income A2J; Conditional entity-licensing: Conditions might include: Mandatory minimum levels of low-income A2J service delivery; Code… [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:00 am by Steven B. Levy
Corporate clients themselves have fixed budgets. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:14 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Paul Levy from Public Citizen also filed an amicus brief, urging the court to reconsider its earlier order and to deny the discovery. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
 The corporate plaintiff was awarded Can$25,000. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/bSZMl6uTlr -> Adware Advertiser Sidesteps Liability http://t.co/FII5sM42zy -> The Top 5 Trends in Canadian Intellectual Property Law for 2015 http://t.co/1kWGYvor0X -> CRTC issues first fine under anti-spam law, $1.1M penalty for Compu-Finder | CTV News http://t.co/g1R41hCVaH -> CJEU on private copying levies in the EU Copydan Bandkopi (Judgment) [2015] EUECJ C-463/12 (05 March 2015) -> No lifting of stay against Nortel to pursue claims for infringement Re Nortel… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm by Amanda Traphagan
Department of Revenue of Illinois and Quill Corporation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 18 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Ryder and Briggs LJJ) allowed the appeal of Mrs Levi in the case of Levi v Bates. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
| The future of private copy levies in the EU | Kat-tips for IP conferences | Appeals at EPO: beware of what you ask | EPO BoA’s independence | CJEU in International Stem Cell Corporation | IPKat’s 2014 Copyright Awards | Waze and innovation drawbacks | Battistelli and Kongstad interviewed | Porcelains that copy advertising | Jay-z’s “Oh” sample gets its decision, yo. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
| The future of private copy levies in the EU | Kat-tips for IP conferences | Appeals at EPO: beware of what you ask | EPO BoA’s independence | CJEU in International Stem Cell Corporation | IPKat’s 2014 Copyright Awards | Waze and innovation drawbacks | Battistelli and Kongstad interviewed | Porcelains that copy advertising | Jay-z’s “Oh” sample gets its decision, yo. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
| The future of private copy levies in the EU | Kat-tips for IP conferences | Appeals at EPO: beware of what you ask | EPO BoA’s independence | CJEU in International Stem Cell Corporation | IPKat’s 2014 Copyright Awards | Waze and innovation drawbacks | Battistelli and Kongstad interviewed | Porcelains that copy advertising | Jay-z’s “Oh” sample gets its decision, yo. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
 Indeed, the Court of Appeals recognizes that “[v]aluing a closely held corporation is not an exact science” because such corporations “by their nature contradict the concept of a market’ value. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
| The future of private copy levies in the EU | Kat-tips for IP conferences | Appeals at EPO: beware of what you ask | EPO BoA’s independence | CJEU in International Stem Cell Corporation  | IPKat’s 2014 Copyright Awards | Waze and innovation drawbacks | Battistelli and Kongstad interviewed | Porcelains that copy advertising | Jay-z’s “Oh” sample gets its decision, yo. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
The Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-435/12 ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie, Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding deciding that "The amount of the levy payable for making private copies of a protected work may not take unlawful reproductions into account. [read post]