Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 31,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 1:23 pm
As the opening paragraph of the majority opinion accurately states the issue:"The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the regulations implementing it require group health plans to cover contraceptive care without cost sharing. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
A letter was sent to the Claimant together with the CFA which stated that all legal costs to date were to be dealt with under the second agreement unless the Court ruled that the new agreement was invalid, in which case the original CFA would be relied on. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:42 pm
The King v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:54 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Adair v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:14 am
State Farm, Oct. 15, 2015, Florida Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Roma v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
" It also states that "Lessors and Lessee agree that the holding in the case of Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Google has filed its Bill of Costs [PDF] in the Oracle v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:30 pm
v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 9:57 pm
Justice Drake in that decision (Phosy & White v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 6:23 am
The Tribunal stated that the time had come to order costs against such employers who persist with such applications knowing full well the position in case law. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm
The Appeals Court summarizes saying, "In our earlier decision in this case, New Jersey v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
(…) Legislation is, after all, the art of compromise, the limitations expressed in statutory terms often the price of passage, and no statute yet known “pursues its stated purpose at all costs. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
Coalition, in tweets is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
[This case really should be captioned United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Fontenot, 198 La. 644 (1941), where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that in a lump sum contract "It is possible that the anticipated and expected profit may turn into a loss because of a low bid or advances in the prices of materials or the cost of labor. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:27 am
Successor to polluter not liable under later law Regina (National Grid Gas plc) v Environment Agency House of Lords “A private company which had succeeded the state-owned British Gas in 1986 was not liable under legislation enacted in 1995 for the cost of removing contamination from land at a former gasworks which had been sold for housing in 1965. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:29 pm
The industry petitioners in Michigan v. [read post]
