Search for: "Courts v. Campbell" Results 301 - 320 of 2,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 10:26 am by David Wright
We have commented before in this space about using offers of judgment to “pick off” the named plaintiff in a class action case, a tactic the Supreme Court addressed in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Austin Campbell
Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Austin Campbell Summary: This article discusses the holding and implications of the Supreme Court decision in Muldrow v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm by Thomas P. Gulick
Mar. 8, 2004)), the Court based their decision on the Ninth Circuit case Worldwide Church of God v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:55 pm by Steven G. Pearl
CBIZ (blogged here) holding that unlicensed employees of a public accounting firm may be exempt as learned professionals, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued Campbell v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:00 am
Iowa Supreme Court DecisionsApril 23, 2012No. 08–2006 KING; KING; HOUSTON, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of OSTRANDER, FLOOD III; DRAKE, Individually and as Motherand Next Friend of LUHMANN, MAULE, MAULE,MAULE; CAMPBELL, Individually and as Father and Next Friend of CAMPBELL; CAMPBELL; CAMPBELL,Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of RASSO, CAMPBELL, and CAMPBELL v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:49 am by sally
” Full story The Guardian, 18th January 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk Related link: Full judgment: Mirror Group News v UK [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 5:33 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Campbell, decided by the Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals (9/17), presents a current look at United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:52 pm
The Court of Appeal opinion doesn't discuss that aspect of Campbell, but it does indicate that the defendant relied on Gober v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:54 am by MBettman
Supreme Court has just agreed to hear an Eighth Amendment challenge in the case of Madison v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:03 am
Some of my disagreement with this opinion is founded upon a displeasure with the Supreme Court's opinion about punitive damages in Campbell. [read post]