Search for: "Creek v State" Results 301 - 320 of 937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 10:06 pm
Ironically, that rule comes, in part, from the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in the case of People v Cress (yet another Battle Creek area murder case). [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 11:58 am
Yosemite Avenue, Manteca, CA 95337 * 338 McHenry Avenue, Modesto, CA 95354 * 3833 McHenry Avenue, Modesto, CA 95356 * 1420 V Street, Merced, CA 95340 * 2651 Greer Road, Turlock, CA 95382 The State is attempting to suspend the licenses of these stores. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm by Paul M. Hauge
So held the Appellate Division in its recent opinion in New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
The board reasoned that Stephen’s agreement with Family Dollar prohibited Mamie from seeking death benefits, as her claim was derivative of his.The Court of Appeals disagreed and vacated the board's decision on Friday based on a state Supreme Court case from 1930, called Brashear v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:06 pm by Robert J. Miller
And, finally, in 1975, the Court stated in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlO’Brien v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 11:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Sand Creek Massacre and the Federal-Tribal Trust Relationship in Flute v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 11:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reynolds (Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Officials) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlHarjo v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Muscogee (Creek) Nation, 508 Fed.Appx. 821 (10th Cir. 2013) (favoring tribal interests on sovereign immunity) United States v. [read post]