Search for: "Crews v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 5:04 am by Kiel Brennan-Marquez
United States (rejecting an extremely broad theory of tax obstruction), Bond v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
He also said that the United States Marshals Service denied his request this year for a hernia operation, saying not unless the situation was life-threatening. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:52 am by Lyle Denniston
United States is whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s ban on destroying a “tangible object” includes only materials like documents or other records, or also includes a physical object like a fish. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 3:03 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., 657 F.3d 1204 (11th Cir. 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit considered a broadly worded contract stating that the parties’ dispute had to relate to, arise from, or be connected with employee’s crew agreement or the employment services that she performed for the cruise line. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:30 pm by John Mikhail
Today our lawyers sent a letter to Judge Daniels acknowledging an errorin footnote 82 of our amicus brief in CREW et al., v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 By way of rejoinder, the United States insisted that the parties had not relied upon the documents, before the lower court or in their appeals briefing. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 12:19 pm by Steven Cohen
Stone Oil Distributors, LLC – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – October 16th, 2019) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]