Search for: "DARE v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
The AmeriKat ready to pounce on any jolly intruderthat dare touch her Christmas tree It has been an embarrassingly long time since the AmeriKat has stretched her US paws, owing mainly to becoming the UnitaryPatKat for much of the past year. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 12:57 pm
Four of those cases are being litigated in the North Carolina Business Court, brought by Dare County, Mecklenburg County, Wake County, and Buncombe County. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
If a ruling in an obscure tax case yesterday is any indication, the threshold for unacceptable chaos is surprisingly low.In Dept. of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Have our views of the goal or purpose of a free state changed over time? [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am by GuestPost
Attacks upon the State itself when they succeed cease to be within the scope of the criminal law. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Kit Kat chocolate bar trademark saga is one that seems to just keep on giving and giving to the IP community, offering new and fangled ways where the iconic (or dare we might now say the opposite) chocolate bar has been fought over in Europe. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Evan Lee previews United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm by Usha Rodrigues
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The parties had an agreement regarding damages, although it was left for the court to determine Paniccia’s likely age of retirement, when, if ever he could have returned to work and his household duties, and his life expectancy … Dares et al. v. [read post]