Search for: "DAVIS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
On 3 December 2020 William Davis J handed down judgment in the case of Stokoe Partnership Solicitors v Robinson & Ors [2020] EWHC 3312 (QB). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
Saul, 19-1442, and Davis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
This second installment in our series on the upcoming legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in California v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
In recent times, the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
See Soke v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Davis, 885 F.2d at 522. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
In Hill v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Davis L. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Davis, 510 U.S. 1315, 1317 (1994) (Blackmun, J., in chambers) (citation omitted); Lugosch v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
(Not that any of this likely practically matters much anyway since both sentences were in California. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:44 pm
Russo and Espinoza v. [read post]
