Search for: "DEAL v. BROOKS"
Results 301 - 320
of 538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Sugar trade tariffs are “a classic case of protectionism, pure and simple, and that has ripple effects through other sectors of the economy, and, for all I know, the Hostess decision is one of them,” says William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington.... [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:06 am
There are none of those annoying inconsistencies, and you know exactly what it is you are dealing with. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
Plenty of other legislation than s 127 is available to deal with content on social networks which appears to offends the public . [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:44 pm
This one explains how the iPhone deals with its fixed f/2.8 aperture. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm
There are specific offences for dealing with ill-treatment and neglect of the disabled by carers under the Mental Health Act 1989 and Mental Capacity Act 2005, designed to deal with abuse such as that committed by care staff against patients at the Winterbourne View hospital last year. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
., a Colorado corporation, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
Brookes v Facebook. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
Ford Motor Co., 5-Star v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:00 pm
In Brooks Cotton Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
The deal expired that day, which was Christmas Eve. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Brooks (Drexel University) and David M. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:52 am
One such instance was a very large and notable trial which they (Sanction) referred to me, May-Carmen v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:28 am
First, in McCulloch v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
The law firm Bains Cohen (acting pro bono for the claimant, Nicola Brooke) and a PR agency are leading the campaign. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:57 pm
The case against Amazon would be a “predatory pricing” claim, and that’s a lot harder to prove than you’d think; since Brooke Group Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:37 pm
The case, Robert Stuart v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
L. 1221-1253 (2011).Rice, Brooks V. [read post]
