Search for: "Davis v. Strong"
Results 301 - 320
of 665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Davis, 408 F.3d 321 (U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
This interest is particularly strong with regard to minors. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
” The two key prior decisions, aside from Crawford itself, were those in Davis v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:29 pm
The case “Davis v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
In particular, on 8 March 2017 campaigning group 38 Degrees delivered a 300,000-strong petition to the Culture Secretary supporting a reference. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:55 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Nava v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm
” Yair Cohen, Cohen Davis Solicitors [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/UKLGwUZy3e -> Chevron Corp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
Here are some early thoughts about the majority opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Last week’s post dove into the controversial story of the West Memphis Three, focusing on how the interrogation of Jesse Misskelley offers a strong tool in the criminal procedure classroom for teaching the Fourteenth Amendment’s voluntariness doctrine. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit (and a few others have follow) includes the following factors to be used: (1) how strong is the plaintiff’s showing of discriminatory effect; (2) is there some evidence of discriminatory intent, though not enough to satisfy the constitutional standard of Washington v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 7:47 pm
Using Zedner v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 2:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
In Sessions v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Case in point is the Second Circuit’s 2001 opinion in On Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 10:59 am
Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Azar v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
May 23, 2018) is primarily a mootness case, though it contains an interesting discussion of the recent 8th Circuit decision Davis v. [read post]
