Search for: "Dawson v. Dawson" Results 301 - 320 of 474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
  But I'm willing to defend it because the underlying principle is a valid one.Then there's this case.It's not that I don't understand where Justice Dawson is coming from. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Rosie Dawson, Religion Media Centre: Decency above all: how Jewish faith has shaped the life of new parliamentary commissioner: an interview with the new Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, Daniel Greenberg, lawyer, academic, former Parliamentary Counsel and observant Jew. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am by INFORRM
An appeal in this case will be heard in June 2018 (see below) Subject Access Requests There were two important Court of Appeal decisions on SARS *Dawson-Damer and others v Taylor Wessing LLP and others (Information Commissioner intervening) – [2017] 1 WLR 3255. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court therefore rejected the appeal as a whole.Initial interest confusion was discussed in more detail by the judge at first instance, and Justice Dawson, in her concurrent judgment to Justice Webb, briefly touched on this: "The extent to which a trademark may be used in metatags without infringing the trademark is, of necessity, fact specific. [read post]
29 May 2011, 7:00 pm by Michael C. Smith
Dean McSwain, shown at right with "Mad Dog" Dawson (can't you tell how much we love our Practice Court professors?) [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:15 am
and industrial applicability in Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc, noted by the IPKat here, is (according to a normally reliable source whom the Kat thanks) to be heard by the Supreme Court on Thursday 7 October. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 4:46 am by Alfred Brophy
 Here I'm thinking about cases like United Daughters of the Confederacy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Consequently, the plaintiff failed to present a prima facie case of legal malpractice (see Dawson v Schoenberg, 129 AD3d 656), and the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint was properly granted (see Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553). [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:12 am
On May 6, 2014, one caller, Brad Dawson, observed the man carrying two sports duffel bags and possibly a screwdriver. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in Dawson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am by INFORRM
For the respondents: Dr Matthew Collins QC and Sandy Dawson instructed By Leanne Norman and Phillip Beattie of Banki Haddock Fiora and Gail Hambly and Richard Coleman (Fairfax Media). [read post]