Search for: "DePaul v. DePaul" Results 301 - 312 of 312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
  By doing so, SOX specifically addresses conflicts that arise when one professional entity performs work for a client but also owes fiduciary duties to the investing public and company shareholders. [28] SOX intimidated KPMG into disbanding their global legal entity, KLegal, which employed mover than 3,000 lawyers in 60 countries. [29]  However, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte & Touche, and Ernst & Young have no intentions of doing the same, despite added… [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
Strandburg, DePaul University College of Law, What if we relied on user innovation to produce business methods and did away with business method patents? [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]